* User Info

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

* Who's Online

  • Dot Guests: 252
  • Dot Hidden: 0
  • Dot Users: 0

There aren't any users online.

* Recent Topics

CF 350 Breaks conversion by greasey monkey
[November 19, 2024, 10:28:23 PM]


Cf Bedford for sale by Gunning
[August 26, 2024, 06:54:11 PM]


Advise on raising the rear end of a CF350 Motorhome. About 3.5T by johnxb351
[August 09, 2024, 08:17:08 AM]


Sale of 1977 Bedford Motorhome by johnxb351
[August 06, 2024, 08:27:12 PM]


173 extractors by kylee dingo
[April 07, 2024, 02:55:17 PM]


lowering my bedford cf by Ratbox
[October 07, 2023, 07:59:56 PM]


Adjustable Upper Control Arms by Saville
[August 22, 2023, 11:35:43 AM]


202 red to 202 black Carby engine by johnxb351
[June 21, 2023, 06:33:35 PM]


CF CLUTCH PEDAL by johnxb351
[June 18, 2023, 02:58:15 PM]


Royal Bedford by wendyh
[October 16, 2022, 03:40:43 PM]

Author Topic: V8 pictures  (Read 15457 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Zeeman

  • Just streetable
  • ****
  • Location: East Brunswick, Melbourne
  • Posts: 275
    • View Profile
Re: V8 pictures
« Reply #20 on: April 22, 2013, 03:22:24 PM »
The lowest mounted engine I've seen was a 350 chev in an old custom van for sale here in Melbourne. The front of the engine mounted with a plate to the rear of the crossmember (kinda hard to see in pic). The motor was very low, weight balance would have been good. Motor was quite far back.




Offline ShaneJ

  • Running on coffee
  • Administrator
  • Apprentice Mechanic
  • *****
  • Location: Brisbane
  • Posts: 1228
    • View Profile
Re: V8 pictures
« Reply #21 on: April 22, 2013, 03:48:23 PM »
Here is a pic of the underneath.. sump is pretty deep.. with a modified sump & different mounts the motor could be a bit lower.
The engine cover is pretty big too.



Thanks for posting this one. If you had used a rear sump that engine would have sat a lot lower.
Shane

Offline MaTTe

  • Apprentice Mechanic
  • *****
  • Location: Karrinyup WA
  • Posts: 723
    • View Profile
Re: V8 pictures
« Reply #22 on: April 22, 2013, 04:03:37 PM »
Zeeman, my 350 is mounted similar to the red block on page 3. I use the bolt holes on the lower front of the block mounting to different engine mounts. the harmonic balancer pulley sits around 5mm off the crossmember.

Shane, I dont have any first hand experience of the 300ci six, however from previous research, in standard form (and modified most likely) the 300ci will produce more torque throughout the entire rev range than a 302ci v8 which is understandable based on the 6 larger pistons making up the capacity compared to the 8 of a 302ci. In terms of modification the 300ci has less options of aftermarket performance parts, tho I have no doubt there are parts available. The head could be worked like any iron head, the intake could be custom built out of tube steel/aly to suit your requirements and I'm sure there is somewhere that makes a custom cam for it. Get the dizzy recurved and modified for HEI, put some GOOD plug wires on it and a coil and you'll likely see some good HP with killer torque. If you make a manifold to suit triple webbers or the like, you'll have a true monster.

Offline Zeeman

  • Just streetable
  • ****
  • Location: East Brunswick, Melbourne
  • Posts: 275
    • View Profile
Re: V8 pictures
« Reply #23 on: April 22, 2013, 04:50:37 PM »
I didn't build the green van with the Windsor, the previous owner did all the mechanical work. The work was all very well thought out except the engine being a little high.

After owning & seeing a few different V8 Bedfords, I think for any future build I would definitely use the same mounting as the Chev above, mounting the front of the engine to the rear of the crossmember as low as possible. The handling of the above van was great by all reports.

302 stroker kits are quite cheap. Less than 1500 for a good quality 347ci stroker kit. You will notice the difference in torque.

Offline ShaneJ

  • Running on coffee
  • Administrator
  • Apprentice Mechanic
  • *****
  • Location: Brisbane
  • Posts: 1228
    • View Profile
Re: V8 pictures
« Reply #24 on: April 22, 2013, 04:58:15 PM »
With my van my aim isn't for max power or torque, its mainly realistic ease of fitment and also efficiency.  When you want to do regular 6000k trips you don't want to be chewing 30L of fuel every 100k's  :(
Shane

Offline Zeeman

  • Just streetable
  • ****
  • Location: East Brunswick, Melbourne
  • Posts: 275
    • View Profile
Re: V8 pictures
« Reply #25 on: April 22, 2013, 05:32:29 PM »
Put it on LPG. I have a 1971 Mustang with a 393 stroker on gas, costs $30 to fill up & lasts most of the week..

One of my old Bedfords had a 150 litre gas tank fitted across the back & a small Impco carby, it was great. This was back in the days when LPG was 25c a litre! I think Gas Research make a carby that fits the same as a Holley carby, air cleaner/linkages & all, flows up to 750cfm but can also be tuned to be quite efficient.

Offline Marishka

  • Global Moderator
  • Apprentice Mechanic
  • *****
  • Location: on a farm in NSW
  • Posts: 1947
  • AKA mty
    • View Profile
Re: V8 pictures
« Reply #26 on: April 22, 2013, 05:40:53 PM »
I just bought a fully recond 351 cleveland /Lpg, and fully recond  tricked up c6, out of a ford GT XB,
Has the JG33 engine number prefix meaning Ford GT Sedan,
As the JG66 was the prefix for 2 door coupe.

My question is=
will a 351 clevo n C6  fit into a beddy van without too much drama,??

Can Anyone shed any light on the fit?

Cheers marty





Offline ShaneJ

  • Running on coffee
  • Administrator
  • Apprentice Mechanic
  • *****
  • Location: Brisbane
  • Posts: 1228
    • View Profile
Re: V8 pictures
« Reply #27 on: April 22, 2013, 06:18:30 PM »
I've obviously never done it but the cleveland is a fair bit bigger than the windsor and will probably cause you trouble with the steering column. Can you measure from valve cover (outside edge) to valve cover for me?
Shane

Offline Zeeman

  • Just streetable
  • ****
  • Location: East Brunswick, Melbourne
  • Posts: 275
    • View Profile
Re: V8 pictures
« Reply #28 on: April 22, 2013, 07:09:30 PM »
Length x width x height, in inches, without carb (approximately):

Ford 302:        29 x 24 x 27.5          Weight: 460 lbs 
351 Cleveland: 29 x 25.5 x 27.5        Weight: 550 lbs
351 Windsor:   29 x 25 x 29              Weight: 525 lbs
350 Chev:        28 x 26 x 27             Weight: 575 lbs

I've seen a couple of CF's with 351 Clevelands fitted, looked OK to me. The fit was no worse than any other small block motor.
« Last Edit: April 22, 2013, 07:36:26 PM by Zeeman »

Offline Marishka

  • Global Moderator
  • Apprentice Mechanic
  • *****
  • Location: on a farm in NSW
  • Posts: 1947
  • AKA mty
    • View Profile
Re: V8 pictures
« Reply #29 on: April 22, 2013, 07:35:53 PM »
mine is 22.5 inch wide Rocker cover to rocker cover ,without exhurst manifolds.
and 23 inch long from back of block to front
 of block without water pump.

I will bolt the exhurst manifolds n water pump on tomorow n remeasure
Id say zeeman is right on ,
Looking at the width of pump n manifolds

I asked the mate i bought them off whats the difference between a C4 and C6?
Lol, his reply was he can lift a c4 but not a C6!
Hahaha, that tells me jack shit.  I said,   :-)
« Last Edit: April 22, 2013, 07:46:30 PM by mty »

 

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal