* User Info

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

* Who's Online

  • Dot Guests: 43
  • Dot Hidden: 0
  • Dot Users: 0

There aren't any users online.

* Recent Topics

CF 350 Breaks conversion by greasey monkey
[Yesterday at 10:28:23 PM]


Cf Bedford for sale by Gunning
[August 26, 2024, 06:54:11 PM]


Advise on raising the rear end of a CF350 Motorhome. About 3.5T by johnxb351
[August 09, 2024, 08:17:08 AM]


Sale of 1977 Bedford Motorhome by johnxb351
[August 06, 2024, 08:27:12 PM]


173 extractors by kylee dingo
[April 07, 2024, 02:55:17 PM]


lowering my bedford cf by Ratbox
[October 07, 2023, 07:59:56 PM]


Adjustable Upper Control Arms by Saville
[August 22, 2023, 11:35:43 AM]


202 red to 202 black Carby engine by johnxb351
[June 21, 2023, 06:33:35 PM]


CF CLUTCH PEDAL by johnxb351
[June 18, 2023, 02:58:15 PM]


Royal Bedford by wendyh
[October 16, 2022, 03:40:43 PM]

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Bannana Joe

Pages: [1]
1
Driveline / Re: CF LWB Truck Wheels
« on: January 17, 2013, 08:24:26 AM »
Up dated.... :D

2
Driveline / Re: CF LWB Truck Wheels
« on: November 30, 2012, 10:35:36 AM »
After a bit of google imaging and looking a various tech drawings... I think I might have a solution.

From what I can gather I should be able to fit an early 80 series rotor and calliper up and still retain the bedford stud pattern and wheels.
I just need to get my hands on a rotor and calliper to do a trial fit and take a few measurements to make sure that the calliper will clear the inside of the rim.

Fingers crossed ::)

3
CF Bedford Chat / Re: Misssing 1976 Bedford Banana Back NSW
« on: November 29, 2012, 12:29:08 PM »
Sorry to hear about your loss.... did you get your truck back?

But on another note.... would you happen to have any pics of your front brake conversion?
And what sort of $$$$ did he charge for it?

Cheers Jon

4
Driveline / Re: CF LWB Truck Wheels
« on: November 29, 2012, 11:14:12 AM »
You can run as big as you want but clearance becomes an issue (hard lock and rubbing on inner guard),

That is exactly what we're thinking.... larger Diam Rim, lower profile on the tyre.

14 is the standard but can go 15 with slightly lower profile, I think the standard diameter is 26in

Yep 14's on there at the momment, with 26' tyres..... Are there 15' rims available???? ;D


Oh and the bedford trucks, j1 onwards and tk etc used bigger wheels and studs, wont fit cf

 >:( F@ck!!! Bugger!!! Just when I thought there was light at the end of the tunnel.
 Are the J's the same stud pattern, with just a larger stud? Or are they completely different?

Here is a picture of the old girl:


5
Driveline / CF LWB Truck Wheels
« on: November 29, 2012, 07:05:02 AM »
Hi Guru's,

Does any one happen to know any of the following information with regurds to CF LWB trucks:
1) Wheel PCD
2) Hub diameter
3) Wheel offset
4) Load ratings for the factory rim.
5) What is the largest Tyre Diameter any one has succesfully run on the front of one of these?
6) Are the standerd brake assemblies the same for the CF Vans and the Cab chassis/truck? Ours has a GVM of 3350 (or there abouts) if it makes any difference.

Now please correct me if I am wrong here, but I am lead to belive that the Bedford stud pattern is unique to Bedfors and that nothing else fits (Wheel wise).
And as such we are looking doing a disk brake up grade on the front...... however we probably wont be using the commonly used Commodore/HQ setup. At the momment I am thinking about using something like a Landcruiser rotor and 4 spot calliper or some thing off of a light truck/Bus(4500kg GVM) to keep the engineers and the RTA happy.

At this moment in time the deciding factor will most likely be Rim and tyre diameter   ie if I stay with the original bedford stud pattern then I am limited to a 14inch wheel (Unless they made them bigger????? ::) I wish) And that limits brake and calliper options.....

On that note, do the larger Bedford trucks run the same stud pattern and a larger wheel diametre??????

It would be great if I could retain the original Bedford wheels, as that would mean that I can leave the back end alone..... butu if we Do change the stud pattern on the front, then most likely we change the rear end aswell..... just so we don't have to carry 4 spare wheels around (On the rally).


Cheers Jon


But if I go too big on the diameter of the rim, then I run the risk of wheels and tyres fouling on the bodywork and suspension ::)

6
Driveline / Re: CF 350 engine choices
« on: November 27, 2012, 07:48:35 PM »
That I don't know...yet. But I do have access to a couple that I can measure up and suss out.

Is the LS conversion in a CF, something that has been done before? I would be surprised if it hasn't ....as it would probably be the only vehicle on the planet that hasn't had one shoe horned into it :D

7
Driveline / Re: CF 350 engine choices
« on: November 27, 2012, 01:02:08 PM »
after some tooing and froing...... We are leaning towards an LS1 at the moment.
but nothing set in stone as yet.........

But thanks to everyone that has contributed, it is all very much appreciated and I'm quite happy to continue to hear you thoughts on theuit these puppies subject.

Also, is there an easy to fit Power steer rack option out there that will suit these puppies?

8
Driveline / Re: CF 350 engine choices
« on: November 25, 2012, 01:17:18 PM »
 ;D

9
Driveline / Re: CF 350 engine choices
« on: November 25, 2012, 10:24:25 AM »
At the momment, that is kinda the direction I'm leaning towards.
But am still open to suggestions.

10
Driveline / CF 350 engine choices
« on: November 25, 2012, 08:46:01 AM »
Hi all,

Pretty new to the whole Bedford scene..... 3 days and counting  ::)

A mate and I have ventured into a partnership with an old CF 350, Banana back car carrier.

The vehicle will have two main duties:
1) Support Vehicle for the Cancer Council's "Shitbox Rally"  http://www.shitboxrally.com.au/
This involves traveling approx 10,000klm through some of the most remote parts of OZ each year, and quite often with a car on its back.

2) We will be using it as needed to transport my friends Model T ford around the place, and sometimes interstate.... but not a daily driver.

At present the old girl is fitted with the Old 202 red motor, 3 speed Trimatic and a Ford 9 inch diff (4.11 to 1 ratio) and is presently returning approx 19lt/100klm... or there abouts. It is also fitted with a dual fuel setup, but when on the rally it will be run mostly on Petrol (ULP and Opel fuel) due to the fact that LPG just isn't available out there.

Now because of her primary duties as a Support Vehicle for the Charity Rally, she will need to be ultra reliable and reasonably good on fuel (as it can be a long time between drinks out there)

Preliminary thoughts on what to do with it are:

Option 1) Replace the Old 202 red motor with a slightly modified 3.3/202 Blue motor. Modifications would most likely be a better cam suited for towing etc, up the compression a little and get the 12 port head tickled and suitable for Un-leaded and LPG.
Along with the new donk, we would like to swap the old 3 speed Trimatic for a T700 4 speed auto from a VN/VP commodore, aswell as changing the diff ratio from 4.11/1 to 3.5/1.  Buy my calculations this should bring the cruising RPM down from 3000rpm@90kph, to 2000rpm@ 101kph.

Option 2) Put a V8 in it... either an injected 304 or 5.7 LS1 with similar mods to the Blue 6cyl (Heads and cam), and mated to the afore mentioned 4 speed auto.

Both options have their advantages and disadvantages.....

The Holden Blue 6cyl is a simple, basic and reliable proven engine. No real mods needed to fit it in. Conversion kits are readily available to bolt the 4 speed auto on the back of it.
But she is still only a 6cyl and in stock trim is making approx  83kw @ 4000rpm, and 231nm@2400rpm. Not sure what we would get after it has been massaged.
And depending on who you talk to the 6cyl is better on fuel, however some reckon that the 8's are better because they aren't working as hard. ::)

The V8 option will defiantly have more power... but shoe horning one in has it's detraction's, and then there is the whole EFI thing..In my experience, mechanical has always been more reliable... KISS principle (Keep It Simple Stupid :P).... water crossings are not uncommon on the rally. Not to mention the dust and vibrations on the back roads of the middle of no-where.
Also should they be required, parts for an old Holden 6 are a little easier to come by.


So basically what I after, is some Advice, Tips and your experiences playing with these little beauties.

Cheers Jon

Pages: [1]
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal